The Navy’s push to retire seven guided-missile cruisers stems from management and planning in its original modernization program that caused exorbitant cost growth, according to service officials. Navy officials have repeatedly cited cost as a reason for the proposed decommissionings, arguing that the service could put the money toward other modernization priorities instead of sustaining the aging platforms. “The cruisers right now and the modernization are running 175 to 200 percent above estimated costs, hundreds of days delay. These ships were intended to have a 30-year service life, we’re out to 35,” Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday told
Safety, Free Full-Text
Rep. Mike Gallagher Archives - USNI News
CMSI China Maritime Report #24: “Incubators of Sea Power: Vessel Training Centers and the Modernization of the PLAN Surface Fleet”
Lawmakers Probe Navy's Plan to Decommission Cruisers, Navy Says
Rep. Adam Smith Archives - USNI News
Vice Adm. Jim Kilby Archives - USNI News
Report: Carnival Splendor power loss likely caused by crew member error
Battle of Midway, Date, Significance, Map, Casualties, & Outcome
Rep. Adam Smith Archives - USNI News
Ship Faced Hangover Kit Bags Nautical Party Favors Cruise Vacation, Boat Bachelorette or Bachelor Party
Tardy ship passenger dies after crew pushes him into sea
USS Port Royal Archives - USNI News
Rep. Adam Smith Archives - USNI News
Success and Failure in the Cruise Line Industry
13 Worst Cruise Lines By Injuries and Assaults - 2023 Picks